<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Movie Listings Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://movielistingscentral.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://movielistingscentral.com</link>
	<description>Movie Listings and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hollywood Prepares for Dueling &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Remakes</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-4/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Classics, Sci-Fi &#38; Fantasy, New Line, Universal, Warner Brothers, RumorMonger, Scripts, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
With re-imaginings and reboots being the keyword for every movie being churned around Hollywood&#8217;s grist mill, it&#8217;s no surprise that they&#8217;re turning to L. Frank Baum and The Wizard of Oz for some fresh content to churn around. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/woz-ruby-slippers1.jpg" />With re-imaginings and reboots being the keyword for every movie being churned around Hollywood&#8217;s grist mill, it&#8217;s no surprise that they&#8217;re turning to L. Frank Baum and<em> The Wizard of Oz</em> for some fresh content to churn around. According to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2010/03/wizard-of-oz-remake-new-dorothy.html">The LA Times</a>, Warner Bros and New Line (blood brothers) are both looking at remakes of <em>The Wizard of Oz</em> in the hopes of grabbing some of that sweet cash that Tim Burton&#8217;s <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> is raking in. </p>
<p>Warner Bros&#8217; <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/oz/30982/main"><em>Oz</em> i</a>s very much taking the<em> Alice</em> route. Written by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/josh-olson/2086148/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Josh Olson</a>, and produced by Basil Iwanyk, it centers on a granddaughter of Dorothy returning to Oz to vanquish evil. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/todd-mcfarlane/1966616/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Todd McFarlane</a> is involved somehow, either as producer or consultant which suggests they&#8217;re really inspired by his <a href="http://www.spawn.com/toys/series.aspx?series=184">Twisted Land of Oz </a>series. (That link is a bit NSFW.) Who wants to see S&amp;M Dorothy and a monster, flesh-hooked Toto? Hollywood might! Wheee!  </p>
<p>New Line&#8217;s project is a lot more mysterious. It has a script by<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/darren-lemke/2105704/main?icid=movsmartsearch"> Darren Lemke</a>, but no title and it doesn&#8217;t come up on his IMDB credits at the moment. It&#8217;s also being produced by Temple Hill who has made a killing with <em>Twilight</em>.  Could it be something focusing on the later books of Baum&#8217;s Oz series? Could they be attempting a more faithful adaptation of Baum&#8217;s book? There&#8217;s a difference between doing that and a straight-up remake of MGM&#8217;s iconic film. For now, at least, no one is looking at doing that.</p>
<p>In the meantime, those who favor Broadway&#8217;s re-imaginings over Hollywood&#8217;s still have <strong><em>Wicked</em> </strong>to look forward to. It&#8217;s still in the works at Universal with producer <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/marc-e-platt/1939816/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Marc Platt,</a> and all this fervent interest in all things Oz might just give it the fuel injection it needs to make it to the big screen.
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19391054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quentin Tarantino to Document Harvey Weinstein?</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miramax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Documentary, The Weinstein Co., Quentin Tarantino, Miramax, Cinematical Indie
Here&#8217;s a curious story we missed when it was first posted by the New York Times last week. So thanks to Simon Dang at The Playlist, who likely himself caught the article late via yesterday&#8217;s correction. Apparently there are two competing documentaries in the works [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-weinstein-co/" rel="tag">The Weinstein Co.</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/quentin-tarantino/" rel="tag">Quentin Tarantino</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/miramax/" rel="tag">Miramax</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie/" rel="tag">Cinematical Indie</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" height="153" border="1" align="right" width="150" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/tarantino-harvey-weinstein.jpg" />Here&#8217;s a curious story we missed when it was first <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/movies/04harvey.html?ref=movies">posted by the New York </a><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/movies/04harvey.html?ref=movies">Times</a> </em>last week. So <a href="http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2010/03/quentin-tarantino-set-to-helm-harvey.html">thanks to Simon Dang at <em>The Playlist</em></a>, who likely himself caught the article late via yesterday&#8217;s correction. Apparently there are two competing documentaries in the works about the independent film king <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/harvey-weinstein/1198873/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Harvey Weinstein</a>. And one of them is to be made by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/quentin-tarantino/1288138/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Quentin Tarantino</a>.</p>
<p>The main focus of the <em>Times </em>piece is on the other film, which is being developed by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/barry-avrich/2105618/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Barry Avrich</a>. He&#8217;s the director of the 2005 doc <em>The Last Mogul</em>, about agent-turned-studio head Lew Wasserman, and he&#8217;s reportedly just received funding for his $1 million-budgeted expose, currently titled <em>Unauthorized: The Harvey Weinstein Project</em>.</p>
<p>And sure, that project sounds plenty interesting, particularly as it&#8217;s being planned as an uncensored look at a &#8220;a brilliant, feared, charming and yet loathsome character,&#8221; who is completely unsupportive of Avrich&#8217;s topic of choice, regardless of how the former Miramax and present Weinstein Company head will be portrayed. But the Tarantino business is what we&#8217;re all really intrigued about, right?
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Quentin Tarantino to Document Harvey Weinstein?</em></a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19389461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/quentin-tarantino-to-document-harvey-weinstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;HappyThankYouMorePlease&#8217; to Open 2010 Gen Art Fest!</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/happythankyoumoreplease-to-open-2010-gen-art-fest-2/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/happythankyoumoreplease-to-open-2010-gen-art-fest-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gen Art]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/happythankyoumoreplease-to-open-2010-gen-art-fest-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Fandom, Exhibition, Gen Art

One of my favorite films from the 2010 Sundance Film Festival will kick off one of my favorite film festivals of the year, as Gen Art has just unveiled the lineup for their 15th annual film festival, which will run in New York City from April 7th-13th. Sundance fav (and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/gen-art/" rel="tag">Gen Art</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" height="271" border="1" align="middle" width="450" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/htympfilmstill32-1264471019.jpg" /></p>
<p>One of my favorite films from the 2010 Sundance Film Festival will kick off one of my favorite film festivals of the year, as Gen Art has just unveiled the lineup for their 15th annual film festival, which will run in New York City from April 7th-13th. Sundance fav (and audience award winner) <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/01/25/happythankyoumoreplease-review-sundance/"><strong><em>HappyThankYouMorePlease </em></strong></a>will open this year&#8217;s festival, which is looking to make a big splash in the Big Apple in honor of its 15th anniversary. </p>
<p>Also screening the fest this year &#8212; which boasts a pretty enticing (from a festgoer&#8217;s perspective) lineup of 7 film premieres and 7 parties in 7 days &#8212; Adrian Grenier&#8217;s (<em>Entourage</em>) excellent doc <strong><em>Teenage Paparazzo</em></strong> (which was another buzzed-about Sundance title), Sebastian Gutierrez&#8217;s <strong><em>Elektra Luxx, Tanner Hall, Waiting for Forever,</em></strong> Scott Caan&#8217;s <strong><em>Mercy </em></strong>and the Slamdance audience award winner, <strong><em>The Wild Hunt</em></strong>. All seven of these films will be enjoying their New York premieres at the festival, and all of them are completely worthy of a night out on the town.</p>
<p>The one thing I love about the Gen Art fest (and I say this every year) is that the price of a ticket ($25-35) not only gets you in to see the film (all features are also accompanied by a short), but you also get access to the film&#8217;s after party at some way-hotter-than-you NYC hot spot, which comes complete with open bar, celebrity appearances and a chance to meet yours truly (I&#8217;ll be the guy making an ass of himself on the dance floor as onlookers point and laugh continuously).</p>
<p>For more information, tickets and schedule, please visit <a href="http://www.genart.org/filmfestival">Gen Art&#8217;s website</a> at or call(212) 255-7300. So &#8230; I&#8217;ll be seeing you there, right?
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/happythankyoumoreplease-to-open-2010-gen-art-fest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19389674/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/happythankyoumoreplease-to-open-2010-gen-art-fest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/happythankyoumoreplease-to-open-2010-gen-art-fest-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Prepares for Dueling &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Remakes</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-3/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Classics, Sci-Fi &#38; Fantasy, New Line, Universal, Warner Brothers, RumorMonger, Scripts, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
With re-imaginings and reboots being the keyword for every movie being churned around Hollywood&#8217;s grist mill, it&#8217;s no surprise that they&#8217;re turning to L. Frank Baum and The Wizard of Oz for some fresh content to churn around. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/woz-ruby-slippers1.jpg" />With re-imaginings and reboots being the keyword for every movie being churned around Hollywood&#8217;s grist mill, it&#8217;s no surprise that they&#8217;re turning to L. Frank Baum and<em> The Wizard of Oz</em> for some fresh content to churn around. According to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2010/03/wizard-of-oz-remake-new-dorothy.html">The LA Times</a>, Warner Bros and New Line (blood brothers) are both looking at remakes of <em>The Wizard of Oz</em> in the hopes of grabbing some of that sweet cash that Tim Burton&#8217;s <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> is raking in. </p>
<p>Warner Bros&#8217; <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/oz/30982/main"><em>Oz</em> i</a>s very much taking the<em> Alice</em> route. Written by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/josh-olson/2086148/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Josh Olson</a>, and produced by Basil Iwanyk, it centers on a granddaughter of Dorothy returning to Oz to vanquish evil. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/todd-mcfarlane/1966616/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Todd McFarlane</a> is involved somehow, either as producer or consultant which suggests they&#8217;re really inspired by his <a href="http://www.spawn.com/toys/series.aspx?series=184">Twisted Land of Oz </a>series. (That link is a bit NSFW.) Who wants to see S&amp;M Dorothy and a monster, flesh-hooked Toto? Hollywood might! Wheee!  </p>
<p>New Line&#8217;s project is a lot more mysterious. It has a script by<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/darren-lemke/2105704/main?icid=movsmartsearch"> Darren Lemke</a>, but no title and it doesn&#8217;t come up on his IMDB credits at the moment. It&#8217;s also being produced by Temple Hill who has made a killing with <em>Twilight</em>.  Could it be something focusing on the later books of Baum&#8217;s Oz series? Could they be attempting a more faithful adaptation of Baum&#8217;s book? There&#8217;s a difference between doing that and a straight-up remake of MGM&#8217;s iconic film. For now, at least, no one is looking at doing that.</p>
<p>In the meantime, those who favor Broadway&#8217;s re-imaginings over Hollywood&#8217;s still have <strong><em>Wicked</em> </strong>to look forward to. It&#8217;s still in the works at Universal with producer <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/marc-e-platt/1939816/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Marc Platt,</a> and all this fervent interest in all things Oz might just give it the fuel injection it needs to make it to the big screen.
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19391054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/hollywood-prepares-for-dueling-wizard-of-oz-remakes-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Nolan Talks &#8216;Superman&#8217; and &#8216;Batman 3&#8242;</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3-2/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Action, Warner Brothers, Scripts, DIY/Filmmaking, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
Time probably stopped for Superman and DC fans when news broke that Christopher Nolan was going to oversee Warner Bros&#8217; Superman reboot, and that David S. Goyer would be penning a new Man of Steel story. (Possibly even titled Man of Steel.) As Nolan is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/scripts-and-screenwriting/" rel="tag">Scripts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p>
<p><img border="#1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/244.nolan.christopher.100406.jpg" />Time probably stopped for Superman and DC fans when news broke that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/christopher-nolan/1978215/main">Christopher Nolan</a> was going to <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/02/244.nolan.christopher.100406.jpg">oversee Warner Bros&#8217; Superman reboot</a>, and that <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/david-s-goyer/1853826/main">David S. Goyer</a> would be penning a new Man of Steel story. (Possibly even titled Man of Steel.) As Nolan is one of those quiet chaps, there&#8217;s been little word on what he and Goyer plan to do, but he&#8217;s broken his silence and given an interview with <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/">Hero Complex</a>. </p>
<p>Nolan remains tight-lipped on Goyer&#8217;s idea, but revealed that it came about as they hit an impasse on <em>Batman 3</em>. &#8220;He basically told me, &#8216;I have this thought about how you would approach Superman.&#8217; I immediately got it, loved it and thought: That is a way of approaching the story I&#8217;ve never seen before that makes it incredibly exciting. I wanted to get Emma [Thomas] and I involved in shepherding the project right away and getting it to the studio and getting it going in an exciting way.&#8221; He wasn&#8217;t willing to discuss villains (though he said Mr. Freeze <em>won&#8217;t</em> be in it) or what time period it&#8217;ll be set in, though he denied all the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/24/superman-to-fly-again-david-goyer-writing-new-movie/"><em>Man of Steel </em></a>rumors currently circulating. There&#8217;s a Superman reboot, and Goyer is writing the script. That&#8217;s all he&#8217;ll say, the tease. </p>
<p>Ok, not quite. Nolan quickly quashed any idea that a new Superman movie will lead to a <em>Justice League</em> spinoff. Superman will exist in his own world of Metropolis, and have no conception of a world where other superheroes exists. &#8220;A lot of people have approached Superman in a lot of different ways. I only know the way that has worked for us that&#8217;s what I know how to do &#8230;. Each [hero] serves to the internal logic of the story. They have nothing to do with each other.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Christopher Nolan Talks &#8216;Superman&#8217; and &#8216;Batman 3&#8242;</em></a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19391338/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/christopher-nolan-talks-superman-and-batman-3-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shoot Your Film in Florida!* (*No Gay Characters, Please)</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Politics
Since 2007 Florida has offered tax credits to filmmakers willing to shoot their movies in the state. This can be a hard sell, as you know if you&#8217;ve ever been to Florida. Just about anything is eligible for the credits, covering 15 percent of the film&#8217;s production costs, but some movies are eligible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/gay-disney.jpg" alt="" />Since 2007 Florida has offered tax credits to filmmakers willing to shoot their movies in the state. This can be a hard sell, as you know if you&#8217;ve ever been to Florida. Just about anything is eligible for the credits, covering 15 percent of the film&#8217;s production costs, but some movies are eligible for additional discounts, too. For example, the current law allows for &#8220;family friendly&#8221; movies to get another 2 percent of their budget covered by the state. A bill now being considered by the Florida legislature would increase this bonus to 5 percent, and would add &#8220;nontraditional family values&#8221; to the list of things that would disqualify a movie from being eligible. And as you know, &#8220;nontraditional family values&#8221; means &#8220;the gays.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bill&#8217;s sponsor, Rep. Stephen Precourt (R-Orlando), said he didn&#8217;t want to target gays specifically, but when the <em>Palm Beach Post</em> <a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/nontraditional-family-values-films-may-be-excluded-from-327836.html?cxtype=rss_state">asked him</a> whether movies with gay characters could qualify as &#8220;family friendly,&#8221; he said, &#8220;That would not be the kind of thing I&#8217;d say that we want to invest public dollars in.&#8221; This from the guy who represents Orlando, home of Walt Disney World, i.e., the gayest place in the universe. </p>
<p>Waitasec. Precourt represents Orlando. Disney is in Orlando. Disney makes a lot of family-friendly movies. Disney could therefore get a lot of tax credits by shooting locally. This is an astonishing coincidence.
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Shoot Your Film in Florida!* (*No Gay Characters, Please)</em></a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19388649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/shoot-your-film-in-florida-no-gay-characters-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Continues! &#8216;Iron Cross&#8217; Filmmaker Sues Variety For Negative Review</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-5/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Awards, Deals, Celebrities and Controversy, Movie Marketing, Oscar Watch


If you read Cinematical every day and/or keep close tabs on the morality of our industry you might have seen a big scandal arise over on Hollywood&#8217;s stalwart trade paper, Variety. Scott Weinberg brought you the news that Variety had reportedly pulled a negative review [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p>
<div><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/ironcrossmain.gif" /></div>
<div>
If you read <em>Cinematical </em>every day and/or keep close tabs on the morality of our industry you might have seen a big scandal arise over on Hollywood&#8217;s stalwart trade paper, <a href="http://www.variety.com"><em>Variety</em></a>. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/scott-weinberg/">Scott Weinberg</a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/26/variety-and-the-case-of-the-vanishing-review/">brought you the news</a> that Variety had reportedly pulled a negative review of the film<em> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/iron-cross/38521/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Iron Cross</a></em> once the film&#8217;s director and producer, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/joshua-newton/898553/main">Joshua Newton</a>, spent $400,000 on advertising banners. <a href="http://www.gawker.com"></p>
<p>Gawker</a> never could get a response from <em>Variety</em>, but <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2010/03/the-strange-mystery-of-varietys-missing-review-of-iron-cross-.html">the LA Times</a> did. <em>Variety </em>put<a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117942356.html?categoryid=31&amp;cs=1"> Robert Koehler&#8217;s review</a> of <em>Iron Cross</em> back up, and claimed they had taken it down in order to investigate &#8220;factual inaccuracies&#8221; after Newton complained. This investigation included <em>Variety&#8217;s</em> editor Tim Gray actually sitting and watching the film, and deciding that the trade could stand by Koehler&#8217;s review. Gray declined to give his own opinion on the film to the <em>Times</em>. </p>
<p>But <em>Iron Cross&#8217;</em> Newton isn&#8217;t satisfied. According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/business/media/10variety.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"><em>New York Times</em></a>, Newton has now filed a lawsuit against<em> Variety</em> accusing the paper of &#8220;contractual breach, negligence, fraud and deceit, and unfair business practices.&#8221; He believes he was betrayed by the paper that suggested the film as a potential awards contender and approached him two months later with the advertising package. They formed an &#8220;exclusive media partnership&#8221; which included print and online ads, 40,000 DVDs, and inclusion in an awards screening series sponsored by the paper. Newton spent an additional $800,000 to finish the film for its brief theatrical run in Los Angeles that would allow it to qualify for the Oscars. The producer claims this partnership and Oscar campaign was undermined when Koehler ran a negative review of the film. He&#8217;s asking for &#8220;general damages, punitive damages, restitution of funds paid and an injunction to prevent <em>Variety</em> from further comment on the movie&#8221; but has not specified a monetary amount.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It Continues! &#8216;Iron Cross&#8217; Filmmaker Sues Variety For Negative Review</em></a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19390994/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Geek Beat: Will Costumed Vigilantes Ever Get Oscar Gold?</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold-2/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Awards, Fandom, Oscar Watch, The Geek Beat


The last thing anyone wants to read on this glorious Tuesday is another Oscar retrospective. But I just now thought of it, and it&#8217;s cool to be fashionably late even to a discussion, right? Don&#8217;t answer that.
One of my biggest disappointments about the 2010 nominations was seeing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-geek-beat/" rel="tag">The Geek Beat</a></p>
<div><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/dk-04204.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<div>
The last thing anyone wants to read on this glorious Tuesday is <em>another </em>Oscar retrospective. But I just now thought of it, and it&#8217;s cool to be fashionably late even to a discussion, right? Don&#8217;t answer that.</p>
<p>One of my biggest disappointments about the 2010 nominations was seeing <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/watchmen-directors-cut/38650/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Watchmen</em></a> shut out of anything to do with costume or art design, particularly the former. I&#8217;m a fan of <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/michael-wilkinson/1965035/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Michael Wilkinson&#8217;s</a> work, and I think he&#8217;s done an amazing job bringing the outlandish costumes of books such as <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/300/23446/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>300</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/watchmen-directors-cut/38650/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Watchmen</em></a> to life. But while <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/sandy-powell/1957487/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Sandy Powell</a> offended everyone else with her bored win for <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-young-victoria/29106/main?icid=movsmartsearch">The Young Victoria</a>, </em>I actually appreciated that she dedicated it to &#8220;the costume designers that don&#8217;t do movies about dead monarchs or glittery musicals&#8221; because I thought well, hey, she means men and women like Wilkinson. Because not only do costume designers on, in Powell&#8217;s words, &#8220;the contemporary films and the low budget ones&#8221; rarely get enough recognition, the costume designers of sci-fi, fantasy, and comic book movies never do. </p>
<p>And I do mean never. While I wasn&#8217;t surprised to see Wilkinson shut out, I had this vague idea that the Oscars of the deep dark past had recognized geek genre movies such as <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/batman/2470/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Batman</em></a> or<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/star-wars-episode-iv-a-new-hope/7512/main?icid=movsmartsearch"> <em>Star Wars</em></a>, and that all those costumes worshiped by cosplayers and costumers had been admired and rewarded by industry professionals too. Shockingly, that&#8217;s not the case. The further I dug, the more snubs I uncovered. I even widened my criteria to more mainstream fantasy such as the Harry Potter series. The Oscar gold is very, very scarce.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Geek Beat: Will Costumed Vigilantes Ever Get Oscar Gold?</em></a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19389209/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/09/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/the-geek-beat-will-costumed-vigilantes-ever-get-oscar-gold-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child Star Corey Haim, Dead at 38</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/child-star-corey-haim-dead-at-38/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/child-star-corey-haim-dead-at-38/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/child-star-corey-haim-dead-at-38/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Obits
I know it&#8217;s considered &#8220;fun&#8221; to see has-been movie actors struggle through Z-grade horror flicks and painfully embarrassing reality shows, but here&#8217;s where things get non-fun in a big hurry. Former child star Corey Haim, best known for films like The Lost Boys, Dream a Little Dream, and License to Drive, died a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/obits-and-memorials/" rel="tag">Obits</a></p>
<p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/coreyhaimobit.jpg" />I know it&#8217;s considered &#8220;fun&#8221; to see has-been movie actors struggle through Z-grade horror flicks and painfully embarrassing reality shows, but here&#8217;s where things get non-fun in a big hurry. Former child star <a href="http://www.popeater.com/2010/03/10/corey-haim-dies-38/">Corey Haim</a>, best known for films like <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-lost-boys/4967/main"><em>The Lost Boys</em></a>, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/dream-a-little-dream/11641/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em>Dream a Little Dream</em></a>, and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/license-to-drive/1020681/main"><em>License to Drive</em></a>, died <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/ktla-corey-haim-obit,0,1628364.story">a few hours ago</a> from an apparent drug overdose. (Haim had dealt with substance abuse and addiction for most of his adult life, I believe it&#8217;s fair to say.)</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s the long and the short of it, right? A cute kid star turned into a not-so-cute grown-up with a lot of problems and not all that much self-respect, and now he joins the drug-riddled stat sheet full of cautionary tales. End of story.</p>
<p>Only &#8230; Corey Haim was born six days before I was. His was always a welcome face on the movie screen as I was growing up. He was funny and goofy and endearing. And then he vanished, partially because of drug problems, and probably (in large part) because he wasn&#8217;t all that great of an actor. But you know what? He was a &#8220;bankable&#8221; little star for a few good years, but (as it often happens) Hollywood just spit the guy out and he became a C-list tabloid joke. Mostly because of his own doing, absolutely &#8230; but it&#8217;s still a sad story any way you slice it.</p>
<p>So make your Corey jokes and have a nice hoot, but when you&#8217;re done with that, go rent a great little movie called <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/lucas/25960/main"><em>Lucas</em></a>, and then stop back here and tell me a Corey Haim joke if you still feel like it. I hope you won&#8217;t.
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/child-star-corey-haim-dead-at-38/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19391274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/child-star-corey-haim-dead-at-38/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/child-star-corey-haim-dead-at-38/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Continues! &#8216;Iron Cross&#8217; Filmmaker Sues Variety For Negative Review</title>
		<link>http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-4/</link>
		<comments>http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Awards, Deals, Celebrities and Controversy, Movie Marketing, Oscar Watch


If you read Cinematical every day and/or keep close tabs on the morality of our industry you might have seen a big scandal arise over on Hollywood&#8217;s stalwart trade paper, Variety. Scott Weinberg brought you the news that Variety had reportedly pulled a negative review [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/awards/" rel="tag">Awards</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/oscar-watch/" rel="tag">Oscar Watch</a></p>
<div><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2010/03/ironcrossmain.gif" /></div>
<div>
If you read <em>Cinematical </em>every day and/or keep close tabs on the morality of our industry you might have seen a big scandal arise over on Hollywood&#8217;s stalwart trade paper, <a href="http://www.variety.com"><em>Variety</em></a>. <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/scott-weinberg/">Scott Weinberg</a> <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/26/variety-and-the-case-of-the-vanishing-review/">brought you the news</a> that Variety had reportedly pulled a negative review of the film<em> <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/iron-cross/38521/main?icid=movsmartsearch">Iron Cross</a></em> once the film&#8217;s director and producer, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/joshua-newton/898553/main">Joshua Newton</a>, spent $400,000 on advertising banners. <a href="http://www.gawker.com"></p>
<p>Gawker</a> never could get a response from <em>Variety</em>, but <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2010/03/the-strange-mystery-of-varietys-missing-review-of-iron-cross-.html">the LA Times</a> did. <em>Variety </em>put<a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117942356.html?categoryid=31&amp;cs=1"> Robert Koehler&#8217;s review</a> of <em>Iron Cross</em> back up, and claimed they had taken it down in order to investigate &#8220;factual inaccuracies&#8221; after Newton complained. This investigation included <em>Variety&#8217;s</em> editor Tim Gray actually sitting and watching the film, and deciding that the trade could stand by Koehler&#8217;s review. Gray declined to give his own opinion on the film to the <em>Times</em>. </p>
<p>But <em>Iron Cross&#8217;</em> Newton isn&#8217;t satisfied. According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/business/media/10variety.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"><em>New York Times</em></a>, Newton has now filed a lawsuit against<em> Variety</em> accusing the paper of &#8220;contractual breach, negligence, fraud and deceit, and unfair business practices.&#8221; He believes he was betrayed by the paper that suggested the film as a potential awards contender and approached him two months later with the advertising package. They formed an &#8220;exclusive media partnership&#8221; which included print and online ads, 40,000 DVDs, and inclusion in an awards screening series sponsored by the paper. Newton spent an additional $800,000 to finish the film for its brief theatrical run in Los Angeles that would allow it to qualify for the Oscars. The producer claims this partnership and Oscar campaign was undermined when Koehler ran a negative review of the film. He&#8217;s asking for &#8220;general damages, punitive damages, restitution of funds paid and an injunction to prevent <em>Variety</em> from further comment on the movie&#8221; but has not specified a monetary amount.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It Continues! &#8216;Iron Cross&#8217; Filmmaker Sues Variety For Negative Review</em></a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19390994/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/03/10/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://movielistingscentral.com/it-continues-iron-cross-filmmaker-sues-variety-for-negative-review-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
